Introduction: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) under local anesthesia (LA) is performed as a day-care procedure as an alternative to general anesthesia (GA).
Aim: This study assesses the outcomes of FESS performed under LA in two tertiary centers over a 15-year period by the main author.
Materials and methods: A retrospective data collection was conducted. All adults who underwent FESS under LA for a 15-year period from 2008 to 2022 in the Department of ENT (ORL-HNS), Dr Kamakshi Memorial Hospital and Prashanth Super Speciality Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, were included in this study. Data and information on preoperative assessment, surgical indications, sinuses operated on, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and follow-up were recorded.
Results: A total of 1,600 patients, among which 1,200 who met the inclusion criteria, were added to the study. The most common indications include chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), nasal polyps, septal correction, turbinoplasty, dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), and posterior nasal neurectomy. All paranasal sinuses were operated based on the pathology. In all cases, LA was used along with intravenous sedation. The majority of patients (90%) were discharged home the same day.
Conclusion: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery under LA is a safe, cost-effective, and feasible alternative to GA and is well tolerated by patients. Complications of GA can be avoided.
Lee JT, Del Gaudio J, Orlandi RR. Practice patterns in office-based rhinology: survey of the American Rhinologic Society. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2019;33(1):26–35. DOI: 10.1177/1945892418804904
Varshney R, Lee JT. New innovations in office-based rhinology. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;24(1):3–9. DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000228
Prickett KK, Wise SK, Del Gaudio JM. Cost analysis of office-based and operating room procedures in rhinology. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012;2(3):207–211. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21020
Fedok FG, Ferraro RE, Kingsley CP, et al. Operative times, postanesthesia recovery times, and complications during sinonasal surgery using general anesthesia and local anesthesia with sedation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122(4):560–566. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.100495
Unsal AA, Gregory N, Rosenstein K. Current opinions in office-based rhinology. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018;26(1):8–12. DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000422
Armstrong M Jr. Office-based procedures in rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2005;38(6):1327–1338. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2005.08.009
Gittelman PD, Jacobs JB, Skorina J. Comparison of functional endoscopic sinus surgery under local and general anesthesia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102(4 Pt 1):289–293. DOI: 10.1177/000348949310200408
Scott JR, Sowerby LJ, Rotenberg BW. Office-based rhinologic surgery: a modern experience with operative techniques under local anesthetic. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2017;31(2):135–138. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2017.31.4414
Radvansky BM, Husain Q, Cherla DV, et al. In-office vasovagal response after rhinologic manipulation. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2013;3(6):510–514. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21121
Thamboo A, Patel ZM. Office procedures in refractory chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2017;50(1):113–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2016.08.010