The Journal of Medical Sciences

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 1-4 ( January-December, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Temperature Changes of Sperm Preparation and Sperm Damage

Alfi Marita Tristiarti, Uki Retno Budihastuti, Eriana Melinawati, Abdurahman Laqif, Darto

Keywords : Deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation, Morphology, Preparation, Sperm

Citation Information : Tristiarti AM, Budihastuti UR, Melinawati E, Laqif A, Darto. Temperature Changes of Sperm Preparation and Sperm Damage. J Med Sci 2022; 8 (1-4):1-4.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10045-00217

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 18-01-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Background: Intrauterine insemination (IUI) have a low clinical pregnancy rate of 5–13% per cycle. The success of IUI was influenced by the method of preparation and sperm quality. Temperature affects sperm quality. Sperm damage is indicated by the presence of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation from spermatozoa. Objective: Measuring differences in DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and quality of spermatozoa before and after preparation of the swim-up method at the sperm preparation temperature of 27° and 37°C. Sperm quality measured is concentration, morphology, and progressive motility. Methods: Quasi-experimental laboratory test with pre- and post-test control group design was conducted at the fertility clinic at Dr. Moewardi Hospital. In 20 sperm samples from infertile patients performed the swim-up method at a temperature of 27° and 37°C. Sperm DNA fragmentation was assessed using the chromatin dispersion test (SpermFunc® DNAf). Fragmentation happens if a halo is found <30% of the sperm head volume. Sperm quality assessment based on World Health Organization (WHO) 2010. Data analysis used the Wilcoxon test with a 95% confidence interval and p < 0.05. Results: DNA fragmentation index (DFI) after sperm preparation using the swim-up method at 27°C was lower than 37°C, 17.79 ± 10.88 vs 18.18 ± 12.95, but there was no significant difference (p = 0.765). After sperm preparation using the swim-up method at 27° and 37°C, the sperm concentration was 19.72 ± 13.76 vs 20.55 ± 12.42 (p = 0.512), normal morphology 11.25 ± 5.15 vs 11.6 ± 5.34 (p = 0.626), and progressive motility 82.25 ± 12.77 vs 82.55 ± 11.69 (p = 0.968). Sperm preparation at 27°C has lower DFI, lower sperm quality but without any significant differences. Conclusion: The swim-up method of sperm preparation can be done at room temperature 27°C or 37°C without any significant differences in the DFI and sperm quality.

PDF Share
  1. Sugihara A, Van Avermaete F, Roelant E, et al. The role of sperm DNA fragmentation testing in predicting intra-uterine insemination outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020;244:8–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.005
  2. Ombelet W, Dhont N, Thijssen A, et al. Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online 2014;28(3):300–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.023
  3. Ombelet W. Evidence-based recommendations for IUI in daily practice. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2013;18:74–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.mefs.2013.01.001
  4. Thijssen A, Klerkx E, Huyser C, et al. Influence of temperature and sperm preparation on the quality of spermatozoa. Reprod Biomed Online 2014;28(4):436–442. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.12.005
  5. Schwarz C, Köster M, van der Ven K, et al. Temperature-induced sperm nuclear vacuolisation is dependent on sperm preparation. Andrologia 2012;44(Suppl 1):126–129. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2010.01149.x
  6. Lestari SW, Sari T, Pujianto DA. Sperm DNA fragmentation and apoptosis levels: a comparison of the swim up and the density gradient centrifugation methods for sperm preparation. Online J Biol Sci 2016;16(4):152–158. DOI: 10.3844/ojbsci.2016.152.158
  7. Cao XW, Lin K, Li CY, et al. A review of WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen (5th edition). Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2011;17(12):1059–1063. Chinese. PMID: 22235670.
  8. BRED Life Sci. BRED Life Science Technology Inc. Instruction for use of kit for determination of the DNA fragmentation level in spermatozoa (SCD method). (2019).
  9. Will MA, Clark NA, Swain JE. Biological pH buffers in IVF: help or hindrance to success. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011;28(8):711–724. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-011-9582-0
  10. Pino V, Sanz A, Valdés N, et al. The effects of aging on semen parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation. JBRA Assist Reprod 2020;24(1):82–86. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190058
  11. Zini A, Libman J. Human sperm DNA and chromatin structure. 2006.
  12. Ramaraju GA, Teppala S, Prathigudupu K, et al. Association between obesity and sperm quality. Andrologia 2018;50(3):1–12. DOI: 10.1111/and.12888
  13. Al-Dulaimi RFM. Sperm activation of asthenospermic infertile patient by using swim-up and swim-down techniques. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2020;14(1):1100–1103. DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v14i1.204
  14. Harlev A, Agarwal A, Gunes SO, et al. Smoking and male infertility: an evidence-based review. World J Mens Health 2015;33(3):143–60. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.2015.33.3.143
  15. Matsuura R, Takeuchi T, Yoshida A. Preparation and incubation conditions affect the DNA integrity of ejaculated human spermatozoa. Asian J Androl 2010;12(5):753–759. DOI: 10.1038/aja.2010.46
  16. Simon L, Lewis SE. Sperm DNA damage or progressive motility: which one is the better predictor of fertilization in vitro? Syst Biol Reprod Med 2011;57(3):133–138. DOI: 10.3109/19396368.2011.553984
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.