The Journal of Medical Sciences

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2017 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Crystalloid Coload vs Colloid Coload following Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery: The Effects on Maternal Central Venous Pressure

Citation Information : Crystalloid Coload vs Colloid Coload following Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery: The Effects on Maternal Central Venous Pressure. J Med Sci 2017; 3 (4):95-101.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10045-0066

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 00-12-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

Spinal anesthesia is widely used in the management of uncomplicated cesarean section. Maternal hypotension is the commonest serious problem which decreases uterine blood flow causing fetal hypoxia, acidosis, and neonatal depression. Fluid administration before start of the surgery (preloading) with crystalloid is found to be ineffective due to rapid redistribution of fluids in various tissue spaces. A “coload” given at the time of spinal anesthesia may be more effective. Most studies have concentrated on noninvasive systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurements to evaluate the effect of such regimens. We used central venous pressure (CVP) measurement technique in parturients receiving rapid administration of crystalloid or colloid solution at the time of initiation of anesthesia (coload). We hypothesized that a colloid coload compared with a crystalloid coload would produce a larger sustained increase in volume and therefore reduce vasopressor requirements.

Materials and methods

We recruited healthy term women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia for this randomized study. Baseline heart rate, baseline mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and CVP were recorded. At the time of spinal injection, subjects were allocated to receive a rapid 1 L coload of either polymerized gelatin 3.5% (Haemaccel) or Hartmann (crystalloid) solution. The primary outcome CVP was compared between groups, as were secondary outcomes: phenylephrine dose and maternal hemodynamics data.

Results

Maternal demographics, surgical times, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) were similar between groups. Baseline parameters were similar in all the three groups. Heart rate increased from the baseline in all the three groups; however, mean heart rate was highest in crystalloid group. Mean arterial blood pressure decreased in all the three groups from baseline; however, highest fall was recorded in crystalloid group. The incidence of hypotension was 66.66% in crystalloid group as compared with 36.66% in colloid group. Crystalloid group patients received 6.33 ± 4.54 mg of ephedrine as compared with 2.40 ± 2.82 mg in colloid group. Thus, the incidence of hypotension and ephedrine consumption was significantly higher in crystalloid group as compared with colloid group. We found statistically significant differences in the mean preoperative CVP reading (p < 0.05) between the two groups, the mean CVP reading in crystalloid group being slightly lower. With preloading, similar CVP readings were obtained in both groups. The fall in CVP during subarachnoid blockade was also not significant. The CVP began to fall with the establishment of the block until the delivery of the baby after which it was found to rise. The predelivery CVP was significantly lower than preoperative CVP in both groups—the fall being significantly more in crystalloid group.

Conclusion

In our study, the results showed statistically significant decrease in volume requirement, when colloid coload is used than crystalloid coload using CVP monitor as a guide. Colloid coloading is effective and superior to crystalloid coloading for prevention of maternal hypotension in cesarean section.

How to cite this article

Sivanna U. Crystalloid Coload vs Colloid Coload following Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery: The Effects on Maternal Central Venous Pressure. J Med Sci 2017;3(4):95-101.


PDF Share
  1. Dopamine for the treatment of spinal hypotension associated with caesarean section. Anesthesiology 1980 Dec;53(6):514-517.
  2. Intravenous albumin administration for prevention of spinal hypotension during cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1980 Sep;59(9):655-658.
  3. Vasopressors in obstretics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968 Dec;102(7):911-919.
  4. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: fluid loading, vasopressors and hypotension. Ann Fr Anaesth Reanim 2007 Jul-Aug;26(7-8):688-693.
  5. Hetastarch co-loading is as effective as Preloading for the prevention of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anaesth 2009 Apr;18(2):150-155.
  6. Preload or coload for spinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 2010 Jan;57(1):24-31.
  7. Prevention of spinal hypotension associated with cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1976 Dec;45(6):670-674.
  8. Propylactic intravenous ephedrine infusing during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1982 Oct;61(10):839-842.
  9. CVP monitoring. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1986. pp. 438-448.
  10. Prevention of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section by wrapping of legs. Br J Anaesth 1990 Dec;65(6):819-822.
  11. Lower limb compression using inflatable splints to prevent hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1988 Oct;32(7):541-544.
  12. Effects of equipotent ephedrine, metaraminol on uterine blood flow in pregnancy. Anesthesiology 1974 Apr;40(4):354-370.
  13. Prophylatic ephedrine proceeding spinal analgesia for cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1976;45:462-465.
  14. Nor epinephrine, epinephrine. In: Goodman LS, Gilman A, Gilman AG, editors. Goodman and Gilman's pharmacological basis for therapeutics. 7th ed. New York: Macmillan; 1985. pp. 145-180.
  15. Intravascular administration of polymerized gelatin Vs isotonic saline for prevention of spinal induced hypotension. Anesth Analg 1994 Feb;78(2):301-305.
  16. Hydroxyethylstarch compared with modified gelatin as volume preload before spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1990;76:731-733.
  17. Comparison of Ringer's acetate with 3% dextran for volume loading. Br J Anesth 1990 Nov;65(5):654-660.
  18. Rapid administration of crystalloid preload does not decrease the incidence of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1992 Apr;68(4):394-397.
  19. Acute hydration for prevention of hypotension of spinal anesthesia in parturient. Anesthesiology 1968 Mar-Apr;29(2):374-380.
  20. A reevaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1993 Aug;79(2):262-269.
  21. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for cesarean section: 6% heptastich versus lactated ringer's solution. Anesth Analg 1995 Oct;81(4):838-842.
  22. Effect of crystalloid and colloid on uteroplacental and maternal hemodynamics. Br J Anaesth 1995 Nov;75(5):531-535.
  23. Colloid vs. crystalloid Preloading to prevent maternal hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005 Sep;49(8):1200-1206.
  24. Colloid preload versus coload for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: the effects on maternal cardiac output. Anaesth Analg 2009 May;108(5):1592-1598
  25. A Randomized trial comparing colloid preload to coload during spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean delivery. Anaesth Analg 2009 Oct;109(4):1219-1224.
  26. Preloading before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. A comparison between colloid and crystalloid preload. Anaesth Pain Intens Care 2006;10(1):9-12.
  27. ; Kennedy, WF. Spinal, subarachanoid neural blockade. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, ediors. Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and management of pain. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998. pp. 168-171.
  28. ; Gutsche, BB. Maternal physiological alterations during pregnancy. In: Shnider SM, Levinson G, editors. Anesthesia for obstetrics. 3rd ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins; 1993. pp. 3-17.
  29. Preventing and treatment of hypotension during central neural block. Br J Anesth 1993 Jun;70(6):672-680.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.