The Journal of Medical Sciences

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2017 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Study on Outcome of Complex Lower Limb Problems treated by Ring External Fixator and Evolvement of Practices toward its Acceptability

Sandeep Shrivastava, Sohael M Khan, Romil Rathi, Gaurav Mundada, Pradeep K Singh, Shounak Taywade

Citation Information : Shrivastava S, Khan SM, Rathi R, Mundada G, Singh PK, Taywade S. Study on Outcome of Complex Lower Limb Problems treated by Ring External Fixator and Evolvement of Practices toward its Acceptability. J Med Sci 2017; 3 (2):35-40.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10045-0053

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-06-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

In the developing world, there is still lack of accessibility and availability of adequate health care. In rural population this further gets limited, due to meager immediate resource at disposition and lack of availability of transports to adequate set ups. This cross-sectional study is undertaken among our rural patients who had undergone this treatment to understand what difficulties they had faced during such treatments and their acceptability toward such treatment. This study was undertaken with the aim to find out the acceptability and adaptability among the rural population for Ilizarov ring fixators.

Materials and methods

The study consisted of 88 consecutive cases (91 lower limbs) of all age groups, who completed the treatment by Ilizarov methodology between July 2005 and July 2012. A retrospective analysis of the procedure was done through the medical records in terms of preoperative, intra­operative, and after the complete treatment. These were analyzed for limb lengthening in centimeters, correction of deformities, total wearing duration, and final outcome. Subsequently, these patients/parents were interviewed with a questionnaire to assess the self-accessibility (ease) toward self-care; self-distraction; self-adaptability–comfort during wearing time and the difficulties faced.

Results

Overall the functional outcome was excellent in 18, good in 50, fair in 8, and poor in 4. Out of 91 patients, 67 (73.6%) followed up and could be evaluated for adaptability toward Ilizarov fixator. Overall, 91.04% were satisfied with the treatment by Ilizarov fixator. In the remaining the main reason for not accepting the Ilizarov method was difficulty in commuting in the public transport, ugly and threatening looks of fixator with so many wires crossing the leg.

Conclusion

Ilizarov method is a very effective tool for manag­ing the complex lower limb problems, especially among the population with low resources. It will ensure delivery of a very low-cost solution offered to the needy patients, wherein otherwise due to multiplicity of problems, integral solution is difficult to achieve within their resources.

How to cite this article

Shrivastava S, Khan SM, Rathi R, Mundada G, Singh PK, Taywade S. Study on Outcome of Complex Lower Limb Problems treated by Ring External Fixator and Evolvement of Practices toward its Acceptability. J Med Sci 2017;3(2):35-40.


  1. Reduction of treatment time in external ring fixation using the monofix device. Acta Orthop Belg 2012 Aug;78(4):543-547.
  2. Rates of pin site infection during distraction osteogenesis based on monthly observations: a pilot study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2012 Aug;20(2):181-184.
  3. Lengthening of short bones by distraction osteogenesis–results and complications. Int Orthop 2009 Jun;33(3):807-813.
  4. Limb lengthening over a nail can safely reduce the duration of external fixation. Indian J Orthop 2008 Jul;42(3):323-329.
  5. A modified technique of internal bone transport. Acta Orthop Belg 2008 Apr;74(2):216-221.
  6. External fixation: how to make it work. Instr Course Lect 2008;57:37-49.
  7. Predictors of postoperative complications of Ilizarov external ring fixators in the foot and ankle. J Foot Ankle Surg 2007 Sep-Oct;46(5):372-375.
  8. External circular fixation: a comparison of infection rates between wires and conical half-pins with threads outside or inside the skin. J Trauma 2006 Nov;61(5):1186-1191.
  9. Complications of ring fixators in the foot and ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001 Oct;(391):115-122.
  10. [Reduction of the period of treatment for leg lengthening. Technique and advantages]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001 May;87(3):248-256. (Fre).
  11. The Ilizarov fixator in trauma: a 10-year experience. J Orthop Sci 2000;5(2):108-113.
  12. Lengthening of the tibia over an intramedullary nail, using the Ilizarov external fixator. Major complications and slow consolidation in 9 lengthenings. Acta Orthop Scand 1999 Jun;70(3):271-274.
  13. Variables affecting time to bone healing during limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994 Apr;(301):31-37.
  14. Complications of limb lengthening. A learning curve. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994 Apr;(301):10-18.
  15. Complications of use of the Ilizarov technique in the correction of limb deformities in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993 Aug;75(8):1148-1156.
  16. New approach to limb deformities in neuromuscular patients. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst 1990 Fall;50(2):99-106.
  17. Limb lengthening and three-dimensional deformity corrections. A retrospective clinical study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1990;109(6):334-340.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.