The Journal of Medical Sciences

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 1--4 ( January-December, 2024 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of Metacognition in Depressed Suicide Attempters and Healthy Controls: A Case–Control Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Sushovan Roy, Vishnu Vardhan Gopalakrishnan, Sumanth Tarikere Parameshwaraiah, Vidhyavathi Malyam, Asha Chandahalli Sannappa

Keywords : Metacognition, Suicidal attempt, Suicidal behavior

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10045-00315

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 15-12-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim and background: Suicide remains a critical public health concern worldwide, with attempted suicidal behavior representing a significant risk factor for completed suicide. Numerous factors contribute to suicidal behavior; the role of metacognition, the ability to think about one's own thinking processes, has gained increasing attention in recent years. In this study, metacognitive patterns between individuals who have attempted suicide and those who are healthy controls in the context of depression are compared. Materials and methods: A case–control study was conducted on 30 suicide attempters and 30 healthy controls. Data was collected through a semistructured questionnaire that incorporated sociodemographic profiling. Depression was assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 24 items (HAMD-24). The Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) was used to assess their metacognition, and the data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. Results: The study group scored significantly more than the control group in HAMD (23.47 ± 4.63 vs 8.27 ± 6.74). In the metacognition total scores, the study group (71.6 ± 14.89) had a significantly higher score compared to controls. Lack of cognitive confidence and positive beliefs and worry showed no significant differences (p = 0.172, p = 0.369). However, statistically significant differences were observed in negative beliefs about uncontrollability and danger (p = 0.005) and the need to control thoughts (p < 0.001). Age-groups above 29 years exhibited significant differences in metacognition, negative beliefs, and the need to control thoughts (p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p = 0.001). When it came to gender, for males, lack of confidence (p = 0.027) and for females, negative beliefs (p = 0.049) and the need to control thoughts (p = 0.001) were significantly greater in the study group. Conclusion: There were significant differences in metacognitive beliefs and processes among these groups, underscoring the importance of considering metacognition in understanding suicidal behavior within the context of depression and developing targeted interventions to mitigate the same.


PDF Share
  1. Navya KP. Metacognitive beliefs, ruminations and executive function in patients of depression with suicidal ideation: a controlled study [Doctoral dissertation, Central Institute of Psychiatry (India)].
  2. Franklin JC, Ribeiro JD, Fox KR, et al. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychol Bull 2017;143(2):187. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000084
  3. Bani-Fatemi A, Tasmim S, Graff-Guerrero A, et al. Structural and functional alterations of the suicidal brain: an updated review of neuroimaging studies. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 2018;278:77–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.05.008
  4. Wells A, Cartwright-Hatton S. A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30. Behav Res Ther 2004;42:385–396. DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00147-5
  5. Carneiro AM, Fernandes F, Moreno RA. Hamilton depression rating scale and montgomery–asberg depression rating scale in depressed and bipolar I patients: psychometric properties in a Brazilian sample. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015;13:42. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-015-0235-3
  6. Yazıhan NT, Çınar O, Canbaz H, et al. Metacognitive beliefs and coping strategies of suicide attempters. Psychiatry Behav Sci 2019;9(1):34. DOI: 10.5455/PBS.20181027113257
  7. Sastre-Buades A, Caro-Cañizares I, Ochoa S, et al. Relationship between neurocognition, social cognition, and metacognition and suicidal behavior in recent-onset psychosis.
  8. Cesur E, ŞahmelikoğluOnur Ö, Erten E. Differences in metacognitive beliefs among patients with bipolar disorder with or without previous suicide attempts. Nord J Psychiatry 2019;73(7):433–440. DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1649722
  9. Cankaya H, Cakmak S, Tamam L, et al. The relationship between suicidal behavior and metacognitive characteristics in male patients with antisocial personality disorder. Psychiatry Behav Sci 2022;12(4):188. DOI: 10.5455/PBS.20220625091308
  10. Hutton P, Di Rienzo F, Turkington D, et al. Suicidal ideation in people with psychosis not taking antipsychotic medication: do negative appraisals and negative metacognitive beliefs mediate the effect of symptoms? Schizophr Bull 2019;45(1):37–47. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sby153
  11. Aghajani S, Samadifard HR. The role of meta-cognitive belief, perceived stress and cognitive flexibility in predicting the suicidal thoughts of male adolescents. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing (IJPN) Original Article. 2020;8(1).
  12. Naderi H, Alizadeh S, Alipour Z, et al. Negative spontaneous thoughts and depression in adolescents with suicidal ideation: mediating role of cognitive distortion and cognitive flexibility. IJHS 2023:31–39.
  13. Sadri Damirchi E, HonarmandGhojebeyglou P, KhakdalGhojebeyglou S, et al. The role of cognitive flexibility and perceived social support in predicting suicidal tendency in university students. RRJ 2019;8(5):61–66.
  14. Sohrabnejad S, Nazari G. Investigating the prediction of suicidal thoughts based on metacognitive beliefs and emotional schemas in male substance users in Ilam city in 2022. JIUMS 2023;31(4):1–8.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.