Background: Hysterectomy, a common surgical procedure for various gynecological conditions, significantly impacts women's health. This study aims to analyze the histopathological findings in hysterectomy specimens, correlating clinical indications with pathological outcomes, to enhance understanding, and improve patient management.
Materials and methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted over 1 year (January 2023 to December 2023) at a tertiary care center. All hysterectomy specimens, irrespective of the surgical route or type, were included. Specimens were fixed in 10% formalin, processed, and stained using hematoxylin and eosin. Histopathological findings of the uterus, cervix, and ovaries were recorded and correlated with clinical diagnoses. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29.0.
Results: A total of 374 hysterectomies were performed: 70% abdominal, 26% vaginal, and 3% minimally invasive. Most patients (34.75%) were aged 41–50 years. Abnormal uterine bleeding (22.99%) and uterovaginal prolapse (20.85%) were the most common clinical indications. Histopathological examination revealed the proliferative phase of the endometrium (40.10%), leiomyomas in the myometrium (24.06%), and chronic cervicitis (23.52%) as the predominant findings. Gynecological malignancies accounted for 28.87% of cases, with ovarian cancer (13.36%) being the most frequent.
Conclusion: Hysterectomy specimens commonly exhibit benign conditions such as proliferative endometrium, leiomyomas, and chronic cervicitis. Histopathological examination is crucial for confirming clinical diagnoses and guiding effective disease management.
Clinical significance: This study underscores the importance of routine histopathological evaluation of hysterectomy specimens to ensure accurate diagnosis and optimal patient care. The findings highlight prevalent gynecological conditions, aiding clinicians in making informed decisions regarding hysterectomy indications and management.
Hammer A, Rositch AF, Kahlert J, et al. Global epidemiology of hysterectomy: possible impact on gynecological cancer rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:23–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.019
Parker WH. Bilateral oophorectomy versus ovarian conservation: effects on long-term women's health. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:161–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.12.016
Gor HB. Hysterectomy: background, history of the procedure, problem. 2018. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/267273-overview. Accessed 13 Aug 2019.
Gupta S, Manyonda I. Hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Current Obstetric Gynaecol 2006;16:147–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.curobgyn.2006.04.004
Uzun R, Savaş A, Ertunç D, et al. The effect of abdominal hysterectomy performed for uterine leiomyoma on quality of life. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obstetric 2009;19:1–6.
Link CL, Pulliam SJ, McKinlay JB. Hysterectomies and urologic symptoms: results from the Boston area community health (BACH) survey. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2010;16:37–47. DOI: 10.1097/spv.0b013e3181cb9931
Desai S, Campbell OM, Sinha T, et al. Incidence and determinants of hysterectomy in a low-income setting in Gujarat, India. Health Policy Plan 2017;32:68–78. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw099
Kameswari S, Vinjamuri P. Medical ethics in the health sector: a case study of hysterectomy in Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad: National Institute of Nutrition. Life HRG. 2010. https://signalsinthefog.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/hyster-ectomy-ethics-in-s-t-for-setdev-final-1.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2019.
Singh A, Govil D. Hysterectomy in India: spatial and multilevel analysis. Women's Health 2021;17:17455065211017068. DOI: 10.1177/17455065211017068
Toma A, Hopman WM, Gorwill RH. Hysterectomy at a Canadian tertiary care facility: results of a one-year retrospective review. BMC Women's Health 2004;4:1–7. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-4-10
Sujatha R, Jaishree T, Manjunatha YA. Histomorphological analysis of uterine and cervical lesions in hysterectomy specimens at a tertiary care hospital. J Diagn PatholOncol 2019;4:72–77. DOI: 10.18231/2581-3706.2019.0014
Leung PL, Tsang SW, Yuen PM. An audit on hysterectomy for benign diseases in public hospitals in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2007;13:187. DOI: 10.18231/2581-3706.2019.0014
Mukhopadhaya N, Manyonda IT. The hysterectomy story in the United Kingdom. J Midlife Health. 2013;4:40–41. DOI: 10.4103/0976-7800.109635
Rather GR, Gupta Y, Bardhwaj S. Patterns of lesions in hysterectomy specimens: a prospective study. JK Sci 2013;15:63.
Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, et al. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:199–205. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00519-0
Butt JL, Jeffery ST, Van der Spuy ZM. An audit of indications and complications associated with elective hysterectomy at a public service hospital in South Africa. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2012;116:112–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.026
Wankhade R, Dawande P. Histopathological analysis of hysterectomy specimens in a tertiary care centre: a retrospective study. Cureus 2023;15:e50497. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50497s
Patil HA, Patil A, Mahajan SV. Histopathological findings in uterus and cervix of hysterectomy specimens. MVP J Med Sci 2015;2:26–29.
Khunte VP. Spectrum of lesions in hysterectomy specimens. J Cont Med A Dent 2017;5:29.