The Journal of Medical Sciences

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 1--4 ( January-December, 2024 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

An Institutional Perspective on the Application of the International Reporting System for Serous Fluid Effusions

Sumaya, Kusuma Kodihally Nagaraju, Vijay Shankar Shivashankar, Jayashree Harihara Kempachar

Keywords : International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology, Risk of malignancy, Serous effusion

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10045-00264

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 20-06-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: The cytopathological examination of effusion fluids is an essential aspect of everyday cytopathology practice. A standard, uniform reporting system across laboratories promotes good interobserver agreement and supports proper clinical care through the use of a set of diagnostic criteria. Materials and methods: The present study included all the cases of serous effusion fluids received over a 3-year period. The study was started after obtaining Institutional Ethics Committee clearance. The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) system was used, which classifies into five different categories—nondiagnostic (ND), negative for malignancy (NFM), atypia of unknown significance (AUS), suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and malignant (MAL). Results: A total of 600 serous effusion samples were included in the study, of which 337 were peritoneal fluid, 261 were pleural fluid, and two were pericardial fluid. The majority of the cases belonged to NFM (511; 85.1%), followed by MAL (47; 7.8%), ND (24; 4%), AUS (10; 1.6%), and SFM (8; 1.3%). The risk of malignancy (ROM) for category three was 75%, and that of categories four and five was 100%. Conclusion: The ISRSFC categories provide a user-friendly and accurate standard for the interpretation and reporting of effusion cytology.


PDF Share
  1. Rodriguez EF, Jones R, Gabrielson M, et al. Application of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) on reporting pericardial effusion cytology. Acta Cytol 2020;64:477–485. DOI: 10.1159/000507311
  2. Zhu YL, Ren WH, Wang Q, et al. A retrospective analysis of serous effusions based on the newly proposed international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology: a report of 3633 cases in an oncological center. Diagn Pathol 2022;17(1):56. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-022-01241-4
  3. Kundu R, Srinivasan R, Dey P, et al. Application of Indian Academy of Cytologists guidelines for reporting serous effusions: an institutional experience. J Cytol 2021;38:1–7. DOI: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_224_20
  4. Alashetty S, Sadasivan B, Dharmalingam P, et al. The role of novel tiered reporting system in serous fluid cytology and risk of malignancy assessment: a retrospective study in a tertiary care center. J Cytol 2023;40:107–113. DOI: 10.4103/joc.joc_107_22
  5. Chandra A, Crothers B, Kurtycz D, et al. Announcement: The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology. Acta Cytol 2019;63:349–351. DOI: 10.1159/000501536
  6. Sachan R, Gupta A, Awasthi PN, et al. Application of international system for reporting serous fluid cytology (ISRSFC) in effusion samples-a prospective study in an oncology setting. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2023;12(5):351–361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2023.04.005
  7. Effusion Guidelines Committee of IAC Guidelines Drafting and Finalization committee, Srinivasan R, Rekhi B, et al. Indian academy of cytologists guidelines for collection, preparation, interpretation, and reporting of serous effusion fluid samples. J Cytol 2020;37:1–11. DOI: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_157_19
  8. Pergaris A, Stefanou D, Keramari P, et al. Application of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology with cytohistological correlation and risk of malignancy assessment. Diagnostics 2021;11(12):2223. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122223
  9. Rooper LM, Ali SZ, Olson MT. A minimum fluid volume of 75 mL is needed to ensure adequacy in a pleural effusion: a retrospective analysis of 2540 cases. Cancer Cytopathol 2014;122:657–665. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21452
  10. Swiderek J, Morcos S, Donthireddy V, et al. Prospective study to determine the volume of pleural fluid required to diagnose malignancy. Chest 2010;137:68–73. DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-0641
  11. Abouzgheib W, Bartter T, Dagher H, et al. A prospective study of the volume of pleural fluid required for accurate diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion. Chest 2009;135:999–1001. DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-2002
  12. Sallach SM, Sallach JA, Vasquez E, et al. Volume of pleural fluid required for diagnosis of pleural malignancy. Chest 2002;122:1913–1917. DOI: 10.1378/chest.122.6.1913
  13. Farahani SJ, Baloch Z. Are we ready to develop a tiered scheme for the effusion cytology? A comprehensive review and analysis of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 2019;47:1145–1159. DOI: 10.1002/dc.24278
  14. Jha S, Sethy M, Adhya AK. Application of the International System for reporting serous fluid cytopathology in routine reporting of pleural effusion and assessment of the risk of malignancy. Diagn Cytopathol 2021;49:1089–1098. DOI: 10.1002/dc.24837
  15. Pinto D, Cruz E, Branco D, et al. Cytohistological correlation in pleural effusions based on the international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology. Diagnostics 2021;11:1–12. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11061126
  16. Lobo C, Costa J, Petronilho S, et al. Cytohistological correlation in serous effusions using the newly proposed International System for reporting serous fluid cytopathology: experience of an oncological center. Diagn Cytopathol 2021;49:596–605. DOI: 10.1002/dc.24440
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.