ORIGINAL ARTICLE


https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10045-00145
The Journal of Medical Sciences
Volume 6 | Issue 1 | Year 2020

Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression and Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment


Chahat Sahoonja1, Tanuj Chandok2, Manish Bathla3, Apurva Pandey4

1–3Department of Psychiatry, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India
4Department of Radiotherapy, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India

Corresponding Author: Tanuj Chandok, Department of Psychiatry, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India, Phone: +91 8427272121, e-mail: tanujveer41@gmail.com

How to cite this article Sahoonja C, Chandok T, Bathla M, et al. Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression and Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment. J Med Sci 2020;6(1):14–18.

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

ABSTRACT

Background: Cancer can have a deleterious impact on the well-being of a patient and can affect the mental health. Cancer treatment is influenced by anxiety and depression and thereby recovery, quality of life, and survival may get hampered. Depression is the most common psychiatric syndrome that has received the most attention in individuals with cancer. It has an intense impact on lives of patients and it continues to be underdiagnosed and inadequately treated. Depression most commonly coexists with other syndromes such as panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Cancer is threatening and understandably many patients get anxious in response to that threat and anxiety appears to increase as the illness progresses. Depression and anxiety have impact on morbidity and mortality leading to worsening of quality of life. In patients with cancer on treatment, there is a greater degree of association between anxiety and depression with worsening of quality of life. In this study, we assessed prevalence of depression, anxiety, and the quality of life in patients undergoing cancer treatment. We tried to find out the correlation between prevalence of depression and anxiety. We also looked at the quality of life in patients undergoing cancer treatment.

Materials and methods: Our study was conducted on 50 patients who were undergoing cancer treatment. We used Hamilton depression rating (HAM-D) and Hamilton anxiety rating (HAM-A) scales, respectively, to assess the symptoms of depression and anxiety. The quality of life was assessed using quality of life-10 (QOL-10) questionnaire.

Results: In this study among subjects on chemotherapy, 46.7% had mild depression, 30% had moderate depression, 16.7% had severe depression, and 6.7% had very severe depression. Among subjects on radiotherapy, 53.3% had mild depression, 13.3% had moderate depression, 33.3% had severe depression, and 0% had very severe depression. Among subjects on chemotherapy along with radiotherapy, 20% had mild depression, 40% had moderate depression, 40% had severe depression, and 0% had very severe depression. In this study, 60% had mild anxiety, 38% had mild to moderate anxiety, and 2% had moderate to severe anxiety. Among those on chemotherapy, 66.7% had mild anxiety; among those on radiotherapy, 53.3% had mild anxiety; and among those on chemotherapy + radiotherapy, 60% had mild to moderate anxiety. In this study, there was positive correlation between HAM-A and HAM-D scores, that is, with an increase in HAM-A score, there was an increase in HAM-D score and vice versa.

Conclusion: In our study, patients with cancer had higher prevalence of anxiety and depression. Anxiety and depression often lead to poor quality of life.

Keywords: Anxiety, Cancer, Chemotherapy, Depression, Quality of life, Radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION

A diagnosis of cancer can have a deleterious effect on the person’s well-being and mental health. Depression is a major public health problem and has a massive effect on health when comorbid with a chronic medical condition.1,2 Cancer treatment gets affected by anxiety and depression. Hence, quality of life (QOL) deteriorates, recovery from illness may get prolonged, and survival of a person gets threatened.

Studies have shown that cancer diagnosis leads to a higher sense of suffering than other diseases which often leads to poorer prognosis.3 Cause of anxiety and depression is high degree of mental stress for sustained periods of time.4 Often these patients will have mixed symptoms of anxiety and depression, predominant among them being anxiety.5 Poorer QOL in these patients is caused by depression and affects patient outcomes. As per couple of studies, depression results in higher rates of mortality in cancer.6,7

Depression is a most common psychiatric syndrome that has received the higher attention in individuals with cancer. It has an intense impact on lives of patients and it continues to be underdiagnosed and inadequately treated. Often depression coexists with panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder.8 Cancer is threatening, and understandably many patients are anxious in response to that threat and anxiety appear to increase as the illness progresses. Depression and anxiety have significant impact on both morbidity and mortality which leads to deterioration in the QOL. Association between symptoms of anxiety and depression is well known in patient with cancer on various modalities of treatment. These symptoms when worsen can gradually lead to impairment in QOL. Primary objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients undergoing cancer treatment. Secondary objectives were to find out the correlation between prevalence of depression and anxiety and assessment of their QOL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study design was a cross-sectional study. It was conducted in the department of psychiatry with collaboration of the radiotherapy department in a tertiary care center of Ambala in Haryana, India. It was an in-patient-based study. The study was conducted in a span of 3 months after taking a written consent and 50 patients were assessed. Patients of both the sexes, aged 18–70 years undergoing cancer treatment such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and both chemotherapy and radiotherapy were included in the study. Patients who were on anxiolytics, antidepressant and benzodiazepine drug treatments were excluded from the study. Patients with history of mood disorders were excluded from the study. Convenient type of sampling was advised. The aims and objectives were explained to the participants including the tool used. Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D), Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAM-A), and quality of life-10 (QOL-10) were used as tools for assessment of depression, anxiety, and QOL.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 22 version software. Categorical data are presented as frequencies and proportions. Qualitative data were analyzed using Chi-squared test. Continuous data were represented as mean and standard deviation. p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant (Tables 1 to 4).

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were assessed.

In this study, 60% had mild anxiety, 38% had mild to moderate anxiety, and 2% had moderate to severe anxiety. Among those on chemotherapy, 66.7% had mild anxiety; among those on radiotherapy, 53.3% had mild anxiety; and among those on chemotherapy + radiotherapy, 60% had mild to moderate anxiety.

In this study, among subjects on chemotherapy, 46.7% had mild depression, 30% had moderate depression, 16.7% had severe depression, and 6.7% had very severe depression. Among subjects on radiotherapy, 53.3% had mild depression, 13.3% had moderate depression, 33.3% had severe depression, and 0% had very severe depression. Among subjects on chemotherapy along with radiotherapy, 20% had mild depression, 40% had moderate depression, 40% had severe depression, and 0% had very severe depression. There was no significant association between depression and treatment (Figs 1 to 4).

Table 1: Prevalence of anxiety in patients under cancer treatment
Treatment
Chemotherapy
Radiotherapy
Chemotherapy + radiotherapy
Total
Count%Count%Count%Count%
HAM-A interpretationMild anxiety20  66.7  8  53.32  40.03060.0
Mild to moderate anxiety  9  30.0  7  46.73  60.01938.0
Moderate to severe anxiety  1    3.3  0    0.00    0.0  12.0
Total30100.015100.05100.050100.0
Table 2: Prevalence of depression in patients under cancer treatment
Treatment
Chemotherapy
Radiotherapy
Chemotherapy + radiotherapy
Total
Count%Count%Count%Count%
HAM-D interpretationMild depression14  46.7  8  53.31  20.023  46.0
Moderate depression  9  30.0  2  13.32  40.01326.0
Severe depression  5  16.7  5  33.32  40.01224.0
Very severe depression  2    6.7  0    0.00    0.0  24.0
Total30100.015100.05100.050100.0
Table 3: Association between anxiety and depression scores
HAM-A interpretation
Mild anxiety
Mild to moderate anxiety
Moderate to severe anxiety
Count%Count%Count%
HAM-D interpretationMild depression2273.3  1  5.300.0
Moderate depression  723.3  526.31100.0
Severe depression  1  3.31157.900.0
Very severe depression  0  0.0210.500.0

χ2 = 32.2, df = 6, *p < 0.001

Table 4: Association between QOL-10 and HAM-D scores interpretation
QOL-10
p value
Very high
High
Either low or high
Low
Very low
Count%Count%Count%Count%Count%
HAM-A interpretationMild anxiety  0  0.0  1100.01781.01150.0  116.7  0.081
Mild to moderate anxiety  0  0.0  0    0.0  419.01045.5  583.3
Moderate to severe anxiety  0  0.0  0    0.0  0  0.0  1  4.5  0  0.0
HAM-D interpretationMild depression  0  0.0  1100.01571.4  731.8  0  0.0  0.001*
Moderate depression  0  0.0  0    0.0  314.31045.5  0  0.0
Severe depression  0  0.0  0    0.0  314.3  418.2  583.3
Very severe depression  0  0.0  0    0.0  0  0.0  1  4.5  116.7

Correlation between HAM-A and HAM-D Scores

In this study, there was positive correlation between HAM-A and HAM-D scores, that is, with an increase in HAM-A score, there was an increase in HAM-D score and vice versa.

In the study, among those with mild anxiety, 73.3% had mild depression, 23.3% had moderate depression, and 3.3% had severe depression. Among those with mild to moderate anxiety, 5.3% had mild depression, 26.3% had moderate depression, 57.9% had severe depression, and 10.5% had very severe depression. Among those with moderate to severe anxiety, 100% had moderate depression. There was significant association between HAM-A and HAM-D scores interpretation.

There was significant association between QOL-10 and HAM-D interpretation. Among those with high QOL, 100% had mild depression; among those with either low or high QOL, 71.4% had mild depression; among those with low QOL, 45.5% had moderate depression; and among those with very low QOL, 83.3% had severe depression.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we found patients receiving chemotherapy has 66.7% anxiety and 6.7% had very severe depression. The three components of QOL, that is, physical, psychological, and social aspects, were affected by anxiety and depression. Similarly, in another study, they found associations of anxiety and depression with the type of treatment. This association was highest in patients who received chemotherapy as a single treatment (66.7% had symptomatic depression and 77.8% symptomatic anxiety).9 Interestingly, our study findings concluded that 83.3% had severe depression and very low QOL. A similar study was conducted previously which showed patients with cancer are more likely to develop depression than the normal patients, which affects their QOL and prognosis.10 Thus, there was a significant association between HAM-A and HAM-D scores interpretation. Similarly another study showed that the anxiety and depression among patients with cancer were high. The authors recommend screening and counseling of patients with cancer for anxiety and depression, which will help them to cope with their cancer and reduce the ill effects on their mental well-being.11 The long-term and late effects of cancer treatment are likely to affect the mental well-being of cancer survivors, which may lead to depression and anxiety.12

Fig. 1: Bar diagram showing prevalence of anxiety in patients under cancer treatment

Fig. 2: Bar diagram showing prevalence of depression in patients under cancer treatment

Fig. 3: Bar diagram showing association between anxiety and depression scores

Fig. 4: Bar diagram showing association between QOL-10 and HAM-D scores

This study also suggests that with increase in QOL-10 score, there was an increase in HAM-A and HAM-D score and vice versa. Smith13 in their study found pain, anxiety, and depression significantly weakened various dimensions of QOL. Another study has shown that pain, fatigue, and depression coexist in patients with cancer.14

Our study also concluded that 44% had low QOL and 12% had very low QOL. This was also observed in the study by Nayak et al.15 which showed that patients with cancer experienced many symptoms that affected their QOL.

Recently the National Cancer Research Institute in the United Kingdom has also recommended priority research into the short- and long-term psychological problems of cancer and its treatment.16 It is clear that a more personalized approach to support the psychological health of people with cancer is needed to prevent anxiety and depression that lead to poor QOL in patients undergoing cancer treatment.17

CONCLUSION

This study was conducted with the aim to find out prevalence of anxiety and depression, and assessment of QOL in patients undergoing cancer treatment. We found patients undergoing chemotherapy had more prominent anxiety symptoms than patients undergoing radiotherapy and both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Patients who were on both chemotherapy and radiotherapy had severe depression. Our study also concluded that anxiety was associated with depression and vice versa. Hence, anxiety and depression are more prevalent in cancerous patients which lead to poor QOL.

We believe that good cancer care needs continuous screening for anxiety and depression. It is paramount that after the diagnosis of clinically important psychological disorders, proper treatment interventions must be performed so that their QOL gets improved.

REFERENCES

1. Üstün TB, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Chatterji S, et al. Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000. Brit J Psychiat 2004;184(05):386–392. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.184.5.386.

2. Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, et al. Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the world health surveys. Lancet 2007;370(9590):851–858. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61415-9.

3. Mishel MH, Hostetter T, King B, et al. Predictors of psychosocial adjustment in patients newly diagnosed with gynaecological cancer. Cancer Nurs 1984;7(4):291–299. DOI: 10.1097/00002820-198408000-00003.

4. Linden W, Vodermaier A, Mackenzie R, et al. Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age. J Affect Disord 2012;141(2-3):343–345. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.025.

5. Brintzenhofe-Szoc KM, Levin TT, Li Y, et al. Mixed anxiety/depression symptoms in a large cancer cohort: prevalence by cancer type. Psychosomatics 2009;50(4):383–391. DOI: 10.1176/appi.psy.50.4.383.

6. Colleoni M, Mandala M, Peruzzotti G, et al. Depression and degree of acceptance of adjuvant cytotoxic drugs. Lancet 2000;356(9238):1326–1327. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02821-X.

7. Pinquart M, Duberstein PR. Depression and cancer mortality: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2010;40(11):1797–1810. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291709992285.

8. Massie MJ. Prevalence of depression in patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2004;32(32):57–71. DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh014.

9. Nikbakhsh N, Moudi S, Abbasian S, et al. Prevalence of depression and anxiety among cancer patients. Caspian J Intern Med 2014;5(3):167–170.

10. Young K, Singh G. Biological mechanisms of cancer-induced depression. Front Psychiatry 2018;9:299. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00299.

11. Khalil A, Faheem M, Fahim A, et al. Prevalence of depression and anxiety amongst cancer patients in a hospital setting: a cross-sectional study. Psychiatry J 2016. 1–6. DOI: 10.1155/2016/3964806.

12. Shapiro CL. Cancer survivorship. N Engl J Med 2018;379(25):2438–2450. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1712502.

13. Smith HR. Depression in cancer patients: pathogenesis, implications and treatment (review). Oncol Lett 2015;9(4):1509–1514. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.2944.

14. Lynch Kelly D, Dickson K, Hsiao CP, et al. Biological basis for the clustering of symptoms. Semin Oncol Nurs 2016;32(4):351–360. DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2016.08.002.

15. Nayak MG, George A, Vidyasagar MS, et al. Quality of life among cancer patients. Indian J Palliat Care 2017;23(4):445–450. DOI: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_82_17.

16. National Cancer Research Institute. The UK Top living with and beyond cancer research priorities. [ https://www.ncri.org.uk/lwbc/#lwbc_questions]. Accessed 25 July 2020.

17. Alfano CM, Mayer DK, Bhatia S, et al. Implementing personalized pathways for cancer follow-up care in the United States: proceedings from an American cancer society–American society of clinical oncology summit. CA Cancer J Clin 2019;69(3):234–247. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21558.

________________________
© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.